As I sit in a plane (yet again), I can’t help but wonder how technology has changed our lives over the last few years. I have wi-fi at 38,000 feet, access to Netflix from my iPhone and of course can type this on a sub-1kg laptop with a touchscreen. Yet for much of the world’s population, new economy isn’t just a fancy app or wi-fi, but convenient access to consumer goods, better and more accessible healthcare and education, cleaner air and water, assistance for the elderly. From an investment point of view, these trends are among the biggest drivers of emerging market economies today.
Why don’t we invest this way?
For some reason, when we invest in emerging markets, many ignore these drivers and focus on the largest stocks listed on their exchanges – the stocks that got these markets to where they are today rather than where they will be tomorrow. Developed and even global emerging indices have adjusted, as you can tell from the sector allocation of their top 10 holdings:
Yet the main benchmarks used by investors buying the largest emerging market – China A-shares – look completely different. Here are the same tables for FTSE A50, CSI 300 and MSCI China A:
There’s a clear difference here – though we frequently focus on China’s new economy and the country’s R&D, we all lack efficient tools to access this market. FTSE A50, the most popular A-shares benchmark is ~60% financials. Of its top 10 stocks, 8 are financials. CSI 300 and MSCI China A are only slightly better at 6 of 10. Now, you may be wondering how I’m going to spin this into a smart beta story. After all, we are launching the world’s first multi-factor A-shares ETFs* in a few days. The reality is that as wonderful as factor investing is, it simply doesn’t matter if you have the wrong asset allocation. That is why we believe that one smart beta A-shares ETF isn’t enough – investors need a mainstream and a new economy version to actively allocate between the two.
What does New Economy look like?
Late last week I wrote about our Bedrock ETF (2803 HK). This week’s post is about the new economy version (3173 HK) and why it’s an investment you may think about for the long-term. First, let me show you the result, and then we’ll dive into construction and other comparisons. On a sector basis, traditional benchmarks focus on financials, real estate and other old economy sectors. That may be where current revenue and market cap are, but it’s also where over-capacity and non-performing loans reside. Growth, on the other hand, is concentrated in emerging sectors such as consumer discretionary, technology, healthcare and the like.
On an individual names basis, the picture couldn’t be clearer. Our new economy strategy has 1 financial name which isn’t a bank or an insurer but is instead focused on wealth management. It benefits from the megatrends of rising middle class and financial market liberalization in China. The number 1 position is Gree Electric – the largest air conditioning manufacturer in the world and one of China’s biggest investors in home automation. The emphasis here is on what China is prioritizing going forward, not what it used to get to today.
How do we build the New Economy exposure?
Similar to Bedrock, we’ve partnered with Dr. Jason Hsu and his team at Rayliant Global Advisors, to design a multi-factor strategy that works for China and a isn’t a blind copy and paste from the US. We use a 3-step process to build a new economy universe that captures the China of tomorrow better than a market-cap index ever could.
Step 1: Identify the universe
To remove subjective bias, we define our universe by referencing the Mastercard Caixin BBD China New Economy Index (NEI)
It seeks to identify sub-sectors that are asset light, high tech, require a skilled labor force, have sustainable growth potentially and most importantly, policy support
The ultimate result includes 111 CSRC sub-sectors (i.e. very granular) across 9 industries:
Energy conservation & environment protection, clean energy, new energy vehicles, IT & related services, high-tech services & R&D, biotech, high-end equipment manufacture, new materials, financial & legal services
Step 2: Apply relevant factors
Narrow the ~900 stocks down to 300, based on Asset Light and Financial Health factors
Our 3 Asset Light metrics ensure focus on emergent, rather bloated, firms
Inventory, Accounts Receivable & Net PPE – firms with low fixed assets are not capital-intensive and have the potential to grow faster
Our 5 Financial Health metrics ensure that only quality companies make the cut
Debt Coverage – companies with large debt servicing costs are not as efficient
Accruals and Net Operating Assets – companies whose accounting results are much better than cashflow results underperform in the long-run
Cash Ratios and Net Profit Margin – companies with low cash levels and profits cannot invest for the future
Step 3: Rebalance to follow fundamentals, focusing on growth and liquidity
We prioritize growth and liquidity, weighting each position on a combination of:
Gross and operating profitability – profitable firms reinvest and grow faster
Asset and Book Growth – low-investment firms grow faster
R&D – firms that invest in research see more innovation
Market capitalization & turnover – liquidity is key when dealing with small caps
Rebalance annually using audited financial statements
How does New Economy compare to other options?
From a sector and top exposures point of view, the answer is clear. Minimal financials, real estate, utilities, consumer staples and more emphasis on consumer discretionary, technology and healthcare sectors. Below is a table comparing New Economy to ChiNext and CSI 300. Most people think of Chinext when the topic of China new economy comes up. But ChiNext is primarily technology small caps only. The hundreds of millions newly middle class Chinese citizens are looking for more than an iPhone alternative. They want cars instead of bicycles, air conditioning instead of fans, leisure travel, better healthcare, cleaner air, higher quality goods, etc. Many of those things can only be developed by larger firms with available capacity. That’s why we constrained our New Economy universe by sector, not by market cap, and then focused on emphasizing the factors that we believe matter most. The firms in our New Economy universe have higher revenues and margins, much lower debt and better valuations than ChiNext. As a result, the portfolio is much less volatile and performs better than ChiNext and CSI 300 in our backtests.
What are the implications of New Economy for long term value creation?
It is sometimes said that PE and VC investing are akin to leveraged small cap strategies. In China, such strategies typically focus on new economy companies as they deliver high growth and long term value creation to compensate for old economy sectors that are slowing amid structural transformation of the overall economy. Even that BATJs (Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent, JD.com) have reconfigured their businesses for long term value creation by inorganically adding capabilities in the new economy space – almost half of China’s 46 unicorns are backed by one of them. China’s most successful technology companies and the world’s most successful PE and VC investors are all focusing on the megatrends that New Economy provides exposure to – urbanization, rising middle class, consumer upgrade, aging population, education and healthcare.
The challenge, however, is that investors struggle to deploy their desired level of capital given the illiquidity, access and capacity issues in this space. That’s where the Premia CSI Caixin China New Economy ETF (3173 HK) comes in. It is a transparent and convenient way to access this part of the market, while also capturing the potential excess return delivered by quality, non-fixed asset, growth and liquidity factors.
*Source: Bloomberg, as of 2017/10/17
This website is owned and managed by Premia Partners Company Limited ("Premia Partners") . Premia Partners reserves the right to change, modify, add or delete any content and the terms & conditions of use of this website without notice. Users are advised to periodically review the contents of this website to be familiar with any modifications.
ETFs trade like stocks, are subject to investment risk, fluctuate in market value and may trade at prices above or below the ETFs net asset value. Brokerage commissions and ETF expenses will reduce returns.The performance figures contained on this website are for information purposes only. Past performance is not indicative of future performance.Persons interested in investing in the Funds should read the relevant fund offering documents (including the full text of the risk factors stated therein) in details before making any investment decision.
This website is prepared by Premia Partners and has not been reviewed by the Securities and Futures Commission.
©2020 Premia Partners Company Limited. All rights reserved